
What to Look for in a Penetration Testing Services Partner
Less than confident about how crucial cybersecurity issues are being managed by your organization? Then it's time for a new penetration testing services partner.
What’s more dangerous: ignoring your attack surface, or trying to manage all of it at once?
When everything is in scope, nothing is in focus. Without focus, CTEM doesn’t deliver the clarity or control it can, and this starts with laying strong foundations in the scoping phase.
If you’re starting out with CTEM and not sure where to begin, this is the phase that sets the tone for everything that follows. Get it right, and you’ll build credibility, show value quickly, and avoid drowning in low-value data.
In this article, we’ll discuss:
While scoping may sound simple as picking what you want to assess, but this is where most CTEM programs get stuck or spiral out of control.
Here’s why:
Teams try to include the entire enterprise in the first cycle: every application, every cloud account, every endpoint. It feels thorough, but it leads to chaos. The team ends up buried in data, unable to act on any of it. Progress stalls, and trust in this new approach can evaporate.
If the scope doesn’t map to something the business cares about such as a critical data, application, process, or regulatory area, you’ll struggle to get buy-in. If stakeholders don’t see relevance, they won’t support the effort long-term.
When there’s no clear “why” behind your scope, your discovery becomes aimless. You collect exposures without understanding how they relate to business risk. This often slows down subsequent CTEM phases.
Some teams scope everything because they’re afraid of missing something important. CTEM isn’t about covering everything at once. It’s about understanding exposures deeply, in focused, manageable chunks.
When you start small and focus on what matters, you create momentum and build credibility.
Scoping isn’t about trying to be exhaustive. It’s about being deliberate. Good scoping keeps your CTEM efforts focused, relevant, and actionable.
Here’s what that looks like in practice:
How long is this CTEM cycle and what’s are the outcomes you want to see at the end of it? That one question should shape your scope. For example:
CTEM cycles are iterative. You’re not committing to this scope forever, you’re committing to doing it well for the duration of this cycle.
Don’t just say “we’ll scan everything in our AWS account.” Instead, anchor your scope to a business-relevant unit:
This gives you a clear boundary and helps communicate value to non-technical stakeholders.
Scope something that you can reasonably walk through all five CTEM phases with. If you can’t realistically validate or mobilize against the findings in this scope, it’s too broad. Make sure to document scope that doesn’t initially make the cut for this cycle. Building a wish list for future cycles will allow your team to adequately prepare.
A good rule of thumb: if you can’t finish a cycle in 30–45 days, your scope is probably too big.
You don’t need the “perfect” scope. You need a purposeful one. A well-scoped CTEM cycle doesn’t just reduce exposure, it builds credibility. Credibility unlocks support for bigger scopes later.
One of the biggest concerns teams have when narrowing their CTEM scope is, “What if we miss something important?” That’s a valid fear but consider these counterpoints:
The key is to scope smartly and plan for iteration. Here’s how to strike that balance:
Being focused doesn’t mean being blind. If your scope is a specific business unit or environment, note what’s excluded and why. This shows intention, not negligence. You can document those areas for future cycles.
You don’t need to go full-coverage to be threat-informed. Ask:
Use this insight to refine, not expand, your scope. It helps ensure you're not creating blind spots that matter.
If your scoped environment heavily interacts with another system, like a customer portal tied to a payments backend, it might be worth pulling both in. Attackers won’t respect boundaries. This should be driven by how systems connect, not just by their proximity.
Internally, make sure everyone understands what’s in scope and what isn’t. CTEM is most effective when all five phases (discovery, prioritization, validation, mobilization) are applied consistently within a well-defined space. If the edges are fuzzy, the execution gets messy.
You’ll get more insight from scoping one application deeply than skimming over twenty. The goal isn’t surface coverage. It’s exposure management that leads to action.
Even if you scope your CTEM cycle brilliantly, it won’t land well if stakeholders don’t understand or trust what you’ve scoped and why. The key is framing. You’re not saying “this is all we care about” you’re saying “this is where we’re starting, and here’s why it matters.”
Here’s how to do that well:
Start with what they care about:
This gives your scope relevance beyond the security team.
Make it clear that this is one of many cycles:
“CTEM is a continuous process. This first cycle is scoped to give us deep insight into one critical area. The next will build on it.”
This reassures stakeholders that you’re not ignoring other areas, you’re focusing intelligently.
Avoid security jargon when explaining scope to non-technical stakeholders. Instead of:
“We’re assessing the DMZ subnet in the east region of our VPC…”
Rather Say:
“We’re starting with the systems that are publicly accessible as these are most likely to be targeted and give us the best return early on.”
If you’ve excluded something significant (like third-party integrations or internal-only systems), flag it. Not to panic anyone but to show that the decision was intentional and will be revisited. When you get more comfortable with the CTEM methodology ( and confidence in the duration of a full cycle) you can schedule when these concerns will be addressed.
A simple diagram showing what’s in vs out of scope can go a long way. It removes ambiguity and helps teams across the business quickly understand where you’re focused.
Let’s say you’re part of a mid-sized financial services company with a mix of on-prem and cloud infrastructure. You’ve just been asked to launch a CTEM initiative, and leadership is on board—but only if you can show value fast.
Here’s what you shouldn’t do: You don’t try to scope every cloud account, internal application, endpoint, and third-party connection into your first cycle. That’s a recipe for analysis paralysis.
Instead, you take a sharper approach:
That’s it. One app, one environment, clear boundaries.
Now that you know how to scope CTEM efforts, the next step is figuring out what’s actually inside that scope. And that’s where the Discovery phase kicks in.
In the next post in the CTEM Chronicles, you’ll learn:
Unlock your organization's full security potential and uncover even more vulnerabilities than before by choosing our advanced penetration testing services.